Magazine
Ideas
Taken for a Ride
The insanity of escalators
“You know, it’s just stupid,” says mechanical engineer Matt Dermond over an empty pizza box and scattered scraps of equations. “If you have a place like a mall, you could install an elevator for the elderly and the disabled and tell everyone else to take a walk. It’s not the kind of machine that you can make practical. Because it’s not.”
Dermond is talking about escalators, denigrating them as a physical extension of our convenience culture. Their primary function is to move significant numbers of people from one floor to another in an environment where conventional staircases cause traffic jams, but most of the time, they are chronically underused.
The grand hall of the cavernous Pennsylvania Convention Center in Philadelphia can hold thousands of people for special events. It is home of the International Auto Show and the extremely popular Philadelphia Flower Show. For several hours each day, however, its escalators churn truss rods and gears without a single passenger. Similar scenes play out in countless hotel lobbies, office buildings, airports, and shopping malls. Although quiet and convenient, escalators unfortunately cost more money to install, operate, and maintain than raising a child, and there are 30,000 of them in the United States.
According to statistical findings attached to the Energy Efficiency Act, which became law in 2006, 90 billion people each year ascend and descend on escalators, making it a more popular form of transportation than commercial airliners. The national energy use of escalators is estimated at 2.6 billion kilowatt hours per year, equivalent to powering 375,000 houses; its cost is roughly $260 million.
What’s harder than stomaching these statistics is finding sources to back them up. The escalator industry is extremely secretive about pricing and energy specifications on specific models. Even though Kone Inc. provides detailed CAD drawings on their website, their cheery phone representatives claim they can’t verify the figures: “it’s a 9-11 thing.” The security guards in the publicly owned Pennsylvania Convention Center prohibit filming or photographing the machines for the same purported reason. Otis Escalator sales representative Jon Fitzroy, however, says pricing, not security, is the issue. “Our company has to customize each job, so there’s never a set price,” said Fitzroy. “The installation can cost anywhere from $150,000 to half-a-million, depending on the size, type, and model you want. The maintenance all depends on what service you use.”
To understand why escalators are so expensive, start with their steps. According to U.S. Patent No. 5988350, credited to Austrian inventors Harold Nusime and Wolfgang Neszmerak, modern escalator steps are made from aluminium castings and a tread component, a molded fibrous material with a tempered binding. These parts are extremely heavy, requiring considerable labor to install and repair and lots of power to operate, and the longer the escalator, the more steps it requires.
In an ongoing quest to make the escalator more efficient, J. Dunlop Inc. has applied for a patent on a plastic escalator step in Europe. Two physics students at Rowan University in Glassboro, New Jersey, Andrew Rosenfeld and Eric Leitner, along with Dermond, an alumnus, are also studying how to make escalator steps lighter. By using the specifications and blueprints for Otis’s model 506 NCE escalator (available online), the group determined that a passenger weighing 170 pounds, riding upwards on a 30-step escalator, will increase the energy cost of that escalator by one thousandth of a cent. It’s slightly higher going down.
“The passengers make little impact on how much energy these escalators use,” says Leitner, crunching the numbers. “It’s all running the machinery, and cooling it, too. Unless thousands of people are riding these things at once, the big, bulky aluminum steps aren’t necessary.” But while improving escalators’ efficiency could lower their energy use, they ultimately represent an outmoded method of transporting masses of people.
Although quiet and convenient, escalators unfortunately cost more money to install, operate and maintain than raising a child.”
Escalators haven’t changed much since they were invented over 100 years ago. Inventor Jesse Reno’s 1892 steam-powered design, the inclined elevator, doubled as a Coney Island amusement park ride. Charles Seeberger redesigned it in 1897 for practical use, and together with Otis Elevator Company, produced the first line of commercial escalators from their factory in Yonkers, New York.
Escalators still seem like carnival rides. The one in Washington, D.C.’s Wheaton Metro station descends 230 feet into the underground, taking almost three minutes. It is the longest uninterrupted escalator ride in the Western Hemisphere and moves hundreds of thousands of people each day. The vertiginous ride is exhausting. By contrast, the Garden State Plaza in Paramus, New Jersey, boasts the world’s shortest escalator pair in front of its JCPenney, at a comical height of six steps. Kids play on them while adults use the more practical, non-moving staircases to the left and right.
In order to cut down on wasted energy, Congress has been flirting with converting standard escalators into intermittent escalators, which run only when someone steps onto them. The Energy Efficiency Act calls for the installation of intermittent escalators in the Capitol Building, to set an example for the rest of the nation. Dermond observes, however, that unless the escalators remain dormant for long periods of time, starting up over and over again would waste more energy. “And if you did have a system that doesn’t get used that often, what is the point of having it in the first place?”
This article appeared in the Summer 2008 issue of Next American City magazine. SUBSCRIBE NOW!
Comments
Comments are closed.








Robert Linn on Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 2:31am
Jeffrey- fantastic article. I wrote one of the articles this quarter, yet every time I pick up the current TNAC, I reread your article. I’ve had the sneaking belief that escalators were wastes for a while now, but you’ve confirmed my belief and articulated that belief better then I ever could.
ken o in SF on Fri, Aug 01, 2008 at 11:43am
when i worked in japan, i noticed immediately the escalators which didn’t move until you passed through an IR sensor. then they started working until you stepped off.
when i see escalators in america, i think wasted coal-fired power plant energy…
Tamra on Sun, Aug 03, 2008 at 12:25pm
I ride DC’s Metro seven days a week - just getting from home to work requires walking up or down four, five or seven escalators, depending on where I transfer and where I get off. I can understand keeping them running steadily from about 5 a.m. to 10 a.m., the maybe from 2 p.m. to 6 p.m. on weekdays, but I’ve wondered lately how much money Metro might save on their electric bills if all but the longest ones were turned off and just used as stairs the rest of the day and night. I do understand the logistical problem of getting and keeping them empty long enough to stop and start them, but wouldn’t it be worth it for the cost savings of cutting about 10 hours per day, five days per week from the operating time of most of Metro’s 588 escalators?
There are lots of stations in which I wonder why the escalators are there at all. They make sense at really deep stations like Wheaton and Dupont Circle, but at the barely-below-street-level stations like Prince George’s Plaza, they seem like something that doesn’t make up for in usefulness what they must cost in maintenance.
Max in Germany on Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 3:49pm
Many German escalators have sensors and stop running if no one is using them. if you step on it it will start and get you where you want to go. It’s not rocket science.
JohnO on Thu, Nov 12, 2009 at 12:39pm
Bravo. I just blogged about this, adding a wonderful video from an experiment in Stockholm where they turned a flight of stairs next to an escalator into a piano keyboard. No surprise, people *really* liked it ... they used the stairs 66% more than normal. And had fun.