Have an account? Login. Need an account? Register.

Building better cities.

Issue 23

Current Issue

SUBSCRIBE NOW
for exclusive online access to our issue archives and more!

City roll call

The Daily Report

How Cities Capitalize on the Gay Community

-photo courtesy of Ladestra

“Come to Philadelphia. Get your history straight and your nightlife gay.”

Sound familiar? This campaign slogan, pitched in 2003, has helped Philadelphia rake in its share from the $54.1 billion gay tourism market. In an article entitled “How a city grows gay-friendly,” Jerry McHugh with Community Marketing Inc. says, “Gay visitors to Philadelphia spend almost 2½ times more each day and 80 percent more on a hotel than other tourists. Gay men and lesbians typically travel more often, spend more money and come back more frequently than average tourists.”

Obviously, “coming out” for a city is a big deal. Not only is catering to gay tourists profitable to hotels, bars, clubs and restaurants, but it is also a chance to give potential residents a whirlwind tour of the city. Consider it an investment. According to Richard Florida, a professor from George Mason University, the development of bohemian, artistic and gay communities within a city marks the beginning of economic growth and prosperity. It is because these populations have been known to revitalize low-income areas with their creativity and entrepreneurial spirit, thus stimulating business and increasing property values. The exchange seems to be mutually beneficial: while the city gets a makeover, gays have a community where their safety and freedom to self-expression is least threatened.

However, statistics from a study conducted by Gary J. Gates of the Williams Institute, state that, while there has been a quintupling of reported same-sex couples since 1990, enclaves for gay communities are becoming … well … less gay. Couples are beginning to move into quieter, less expensive suburban areas and cities—such as Fort Worth or Albuquerque—that, until recently, were not widely thought of as gay-friendly.

Does this migration pattern indicate that the same revitalization process will be taking place in the newly developed gay communities? And if this pattern continues to repeat itself, who will truly benefit from the phenomenon: the gay population or the gay-friendly?


Comments +

  1. No comments yet.

Add your comment

Have an account? Login. Want one? Sign up.

Please be civil. Some HTML is allowed. <b>, <i>, <u>, <em>, <strike>, <strong>, <pre>, <code>, <blockquote>

Enter the word you see in the image above.

Browse archives

Latest entries

Latest comments

  • hat: It’s telling of the author’s biases that she compares just the travel time of the maglev-only … (read)
  • Lauren Kremer: Good Job Josh. (read)
  • Elizabeth wolf: Commenting on the gramine america bank and poverty in the u.s., i would like to say … (read)
  • Brad Irwin: Thank you for your thoughts, Josh. I struggle with this. On the one hand, I … (read)
  • Markus Khan: That looks real. I wonder how they imagine such structure and design it (read)
URBANEXUS CINCINNATI RSVP Facebook Ask An Urban Historian Revise [UPDATED] 2008 Ozzie Award-Winner Livable Streets Initiative

Browse by category

Browse by tag

Subscribe to the Daily Report

Blogroll