Have an account? Login. Need an account? Register.

Building better cities.

Issue 21

Current Issue

SUBSCRIBE NOW
for exclusive online access to our issue archives and more!

City roll call

The Daily Report

Bellevue neighborhoods need variety

I’ve known since I moved to Bellevue that it is a city unlike any other. Cliché, I know, but stick with me for a minute.

The typical “city” aspect of Bellevue covers only twenty square blocks. Past that downtown core, Bellevue becomes much more suburban.

Bellevue lacks diversity in its population, as I discussed in my last post, but the city also lacks the diversity of scale found in larger cities. Seattle, for example, has a number of neighborhoods that span the density scale from suburban to high-rise. More importantly, Seattle has several neighborhoods at each scale.

Bellevue instead has only one neighborhood for each scale. The high-rises are downtown, bordered by Crossroads to the east - mid-range apartment complexes and townhouses, including a number of senior communities. Southwest of Crossroads is Factoria, the lower rent apartment complexes that house much of the city’s minorities. Both Crossroads and Factoria are anchored by shopping centers sharing the same names.

North of downtown quickly becomes quiet single-family detached housing following the shoreline of Lake Washington. Many of these properties clock in above the seven-figure mark. Slightly more affordable single-family homes can be found southeast of downtown between the Crossroads and Factoria nodes. Due south of downtown are low-rise townhouses.

Each neighborhood of Bellevue occupies its own niche on the density scale, effectively confining residents based on their housing needs or desires. The city’s diversity problem manifests itself both in demographics and organization.

Diversifying neighborhoods will be a critical means to diversifying the population, but one cannot effectively be accomplished without the other. To rescue Bellevue from its bland fate, the city needs to address both objectives to become the regional influence it strives to be.


Comments +

  1. David Patterson
    Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 7:23pm

    Why are white people “bland”?

    I’ll wager one answer: they aren’t.  The notion that your new home lacks dynamism and vibrancy and isn’t a good one in which to live a full, rich life because it hasn’t got the right “diversity mix” or doesn’t reflect some fantastical idea of how a “real” city should look makes me shake my head. 

    Where did this new old chestnut come from, and why does it persist?
    -----


Add your comment

Have an account? Login. Want one? Sign up.

Please be civil. Some HTML is allowed. <b>, <i>, <u>, <em>, <strike>, <strong>, <pre>, <code>, <blockquote>

Enter the word you see in the image above.

Browse archives

Latest entries

Latest comments

  • CD: I dunno about Detroit, seeing as how many young Ohioans and Michiganders end up in Chicago … (read)
  • Dan: I foresee a return to people’s city of origin in 2009.  A diaspora back to core … (read)
  • Doc Barnett: I think New York will be fine and, in a positive sense, the economic crisis is … (read)
  • chris: In the teaser for this article, you misused the phrase ‘begs the question.’ This mistake is … (read)
  • Matt: Central city development has been hard to fund and risky to undertake for quite some time … (read)
URBANEXUS BOSTON RSVP Buy Art. Look Smart. 2008 Ozzie Award-Winner Ask An Urban Historian Revise [UPDATED] Facebook SMIBE

Browse by category

Browse by tag

Subscribe to the Daily Report

Blogroll