Have an account? Login. Need an account? Register.

The future of urban life.

Next American Vanguard 2010

Buzz

How to Solve Homelessness? Try Providing Housing

As the amount of housing foreclosures has jumped, the number of individuals who have found them themselves without appropriate, permanent shelter has increased. In addition to the Annual Homeless Assessment Report (AHAR) The U.S Department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD) decided this summer to tract homelessness in specific regions quarterly. The new report, The Homelessness Pulse Project  is meant to help HUD “gain a better understanding of the impact of the current economic crisis on homelessness.” In their 2008 Report to Congress HUD found that “[o]n a single night in January 2008, there were 664,414 sheltered and unsheltered homeless persons nationwide. Nearly 6 in 10 people who were homeless at a single point-in-time were in emergency shelters or transitional housing programs, while 42 percent were unsheltered on the “street” or in other places not meant for human habitation.” The Homeless Cost Study, recently released by The United Way of Great Los Angeles, is another report that finds placing chronically homeless people into permanent supportive housing will not only give those without shelter a safe place to live but save metropolitan areas and taxpayers thousands of dollars.

Other recent reports and studies done by organizations share this view.  In a 2009 Policy Guide of the National Alliance to End Homelessness found that providing “[a]ffordable housing is the primary solution to ending episodic homelessness” and created a guide about adopting a ‘Housing First approach.’  Other current studies have focused on the cost of homeless individuals on hospitals.  An article about studies conducted in Chicago and Seattle “found that hospitals saved hundreds of thousands of dollars by helping to provide… services together with local advocacy groups.”

According to the Great Los Angeles study over $80,000 of tax dollars will be saved if permanent housing is constructed for homeless individuals. The Los Angeles study is based on the “in-debt analysis of the before and after experiences of four chronically homeless people.”  The individuals were placed in “permanent supportive housing.” By placing homeless individuals in these permanent homes, researchers found that participants not only improved their lives and health but that their placement in non-temporary housing decreased the amount of money that would have to be spent on public services such as hospital visits.

los angeles foreclosures homelessness akua nyame-mensah united way study

Comments

  1. Nels Nelson in the netherlands on Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 8:30am

    Or allow squatting of buildings which have been empty for more than 1 year.  This will end speculation and create efficient use of space.  It has worked well in The Netherlands since 1974.  Another effect has been the creation of an anti-squatting business, in which owners of empty buildings hire anti-squatters to live in empty buildings for extremely low rent to maintain the building and to protect against squatters coming in and gaining what is called ‘peace-house’ in which they gain tenant rights.

  2. Michael Isla in california on Tue, Dec 01, 2009 at 1:58am

    being homeless with a family, or just by yourself is never easy. especially is work is scarse. Rent is getting higher, when the rent is due is due. money is what talks. and if you do not have it start packing up. so much land to roam and build, but still something not right. is it political, what ever it is, is not getting better. it takes almost 10 years to get section 8 or hud. all i hear on t.v is how all these promblems are being solve, yeah to only does that do not get discriminated. As a student of architecture: design of urban sociaty needs to be analyse on how many people can we get off the streets and to start a new life and see our American Goverment as hope for chance. being homeless in the streets is just a ticket to jail if you do not stay away from regular sociaty. looking for an opportunity is better than a hand out.  If the government does not get involve who will. what ideas can we come up with that could change all this. let the local government bail out the people who are looking for a place to call home. than spent money on fancy furnitures.

Comments are closed.